TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

REGENXBIO Inc.

9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210

Rockville, MD 20850

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the 20192020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of REGENXBIO Inc., which will be held on May 31, 2019,29, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. local time at the Company’s offices located at 9714 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

When this Proxy Statement refers to “REGENXBIO,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our,” it is referring to REGENXBIO Inc.

We are making this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report onForm 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019 (the “Annual Report”) available to stockholders at www.proxyvote.com. On or about April 11, 2019,9, 2020, we will begin mailing to certain of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access and review this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report. The Notice also instructs you how you may submit your proxy over the internet or via telephone. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting those materials included in the Notice.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING

Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement and a related proxy card?

You have received these proxy materials because you owned shares of REGENXBIO common stock asat the close of April 1, 2019,business on March 30, 2020, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), and our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement describes matters on which we would like you to vote at the Annual Meeting so that you can make an informed decision.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail instead of a printed set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are permitted to furnish our proxy materials over the internet to our stockholders by delivering the Notice in the mail. As a result, only stockholders who specifically request a printed copy of the Proxy Statement will receive one. Instead, the Notice instructs stockholders on how to access and review the Proxy Statement and Annual Report over the internet at www.proxyvote.com. The Notice also instructs stockholders on how they may submit their proxy via telephone or the internet. If a stockholder who received a Notice would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, such stockholder should follow the instructions for requesting these materials contained in the Notice.

How may I vote at the Annual Meeting?

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply follow the instructions below to submit your proxy via telephone or the internet. If you received a printed set of materials, you may also vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card.

When you vote, regardless of the method used, you appoint Kenneth T. Mills, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and Patrick J. Christmas, our General Counsel,Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, as your representatives (or proxyholders) for the Annual Meeting. They will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting as you

have instructed them or, if a matter that is not on the proxy card comes up for vote, in accordance with their best judgment. This way, your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 36,611,15737,186,219 shares of our common stock outstanding. All of these outstanding shares are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (one vote per share of common stock) in connection with the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement.

A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available at the Annual Meeting and will be accessible for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal place of business, 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, during ordinary business hours.

What is a stockholder of record and how can I vote if I am a stockholder of record?

If, on the Record Date, your shares of common stock were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., then you are a stockholder of record. Stockholders of record may vote via the internet, telephone or mail (if you received a proxy card by mail) as described below. Stockholders also may attend the meeting and vote in person.

The method you use to vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. Written ballots will be passed out to anyone who wants to vote at the Annual Meeting. In all cases, your shares will be voted according to your instructions.

What is a beneficial owner of shares and how can I vote if I am a beneficial owner?

If, on the Record Date, your shares of common stock were not held in your name, but rather were held through a bank, broker or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and you will need to submit voting instructions to the institution that holds your shares. If you do not give instructions to your broker, your broker can vote your shares only with respect to “discretionary” items, but not with respect to“non-discretionary” “non-discretionary” items.

Discretionary items are proposals considered routine under theapplicable rules on which your broker may vote shares held in street name without your voting instructions. Onnon-discretionary items for which you do not give your broker instructions, the shares will not be voted, which is referred to as a “brokernon-vote.” Please see “—What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting and what vote is required to approve each proposal?” below for details regarding broker voting for each proposal.

As a beneficial owner, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner and not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:

If you hold your shares in street name, you must contact the bank, broker or other nominee holding your shares and follow their instructions for changing your vote.

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), a quorum will be present if a majority of the voting power of outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors is represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 36,611,15737,186,219 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, 18,305,57918,593,110 shares must be represented by stockholders present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy to have a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your bank, broker or other nominee) or if you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Abstentions and broker discretionary votes will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, the chairman of the meeting or the holders of a majority of the votes present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date.

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting and what vote is required to approve each proposal?

The following table provides a description of the proposals that will be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

Plurality of Votes Cast means that, with respect to Proposal 1, the nominees for director receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected and, with respect to Proposal 4, the option receiving the greatest number of votes will be recommended by stockholders to the Board.elected. With respect to Proposal 1, withheld votes, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the election of a nominee. With respect to Proposal 4, abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

Majority of Votes Cast means that a proposal that receives an affirmative majority of the votes cast will be approved. Abstentions and brokernon-votes, if any, will not be counted “For” or “Against” Proposal 2 or Proposal 3 and will have no effect on the outcome of either proposal. We do not expect to receive brokernon-votes for Proposal 2, as banks, brokers and other nominees will have discretionary authority to vote shares for which beneficial owners do not provide voting instructions.instructions on that proposal.

Votes on each proposal will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

The Company does not know of any other matters that may be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. Should any other business come before the Annual Meeting, the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by proxies in accordance with their best judgment. If you hold shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card will not be able to vote your shares on any other business that comes before the Annual Meeting unless such individuals receive instructions from you with respect to such other business.

What happens if a director nominee is unable to stand for election?

If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board may either reduce the number of directors that serve on the Board or designate a substitute nominee. If the Board designates a substitute nominee, shares represented by proxies voted for the nominee who is unable to stand for election will be voted for the substitute nominee.

What happens if I submit my proxy but do not provide voting instructions?

If you submit a proxy via telephone or the internet or return a signed and dated proxy card without indicating instructions with respect to a specific proposal, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendation for such proposal.

If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxyholders for shares voted on the proxy card (i.e., one of the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card) will vote your shares using their best judgment.

What do I need to show to attend the Annual Meeting in person?

You will need proof of your share ownership as of the Record Date and a form of photo identification, such as a valid driver’s license. If you do not have proof of ownership and valid photo identification, you may not be admitted to the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, your ownership as of the Record Date will be verified prior to admittance into the meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares in street name, you must provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as an account statement or similar evidence of ownership.

All bags, briefcases and packages will be held at registration and will not be allowed in the Annual Meeting. We will not permit the use of cameras (including cell phones and other devices with photographic capabilities) or other recording devices in the meeting room.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

The accompanying proxy is being solicited by the Board. In addition to this solicitation, directors and employees of the Company may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. In addition, the Company may also retain one or more third parties to aid in the solicitation of brokers, banks and institutional and other stockholders. We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned?

Unless the polls have closed or you have revoked your proxy, your proxy will still be in effect and may be voted once the Annual Meeting is reconvened. However, you will still be able to change or revoke your proxy with respect to any proposal until the polls have closed for voting on such proposal.

What would happen if a change to the Annual Meeting is necessary due to exigent circumstances?

We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we continue to monitor the situation regarding the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) closely, taking into account guidance from public health authorities. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the related protocols that federal, state and local governments may impose. Accordingly, we may determine that it is advisable to change the date, time or location of the Annual Meeting, or potentially conduct the Annual Meeting virtually. In the event that we change the date, time, location or manner of conducting the Annual Meeting, we will issue a press release announcing that fact as promptly as practicable, with details on how to participate and vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the Investors section of our website at www.regenxbio.com one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

If we elect to conduct the Annual Meeting virtually, it would have no impact on your ability to submit your proxy by using the internet or telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card, each as explained in this Proxy Statement. We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results are expected to be announced at the Annual Meeting. We expect to report final voting results in a Current Report onForm 8-K8‑K filed with the SEC no later than the fourth business day after the Annual Meeting.

How can I find the Company’s proxy materials on the internet?

This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available at our corporate website at www.regenxbio.com. You also can obtain copies without charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may access these materials at www.proxyvote.com. Website addresses referenced herein are intended to provide inactive, textual references only, and the information on these websites is not part of this Proxy Statement.

How do I obtain a separate set of the Company’s proxy materials if I share an address with other stockholders?

In some cases, stockholders holding their shares in a brokerage or bank account who share the same surname and address receive only one copy of the Notice. This practice, called “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. If you would like to have a separate copy of the Notice, the Annual Report or this Proxy Statement mailed to you or receive separate copies of future mailings, please submit your request to the address or phone number that appears on your Notice or proxy card. We will deliver such additional copies promptly upon receipt of such request.

In other cases, stockholders receiving multiple copies of proxy materials at the same address may wish to receive only one copy. If you would like to receive only one copy, please submit your request to the address or phone number that appears on your Notice or proxy card.

Can I receive future proxy materials electronically?

Yes. This Proxy Statement and the Annual Report are available on our website at www.regenxbio.com. Instead of receiving paper copies in the mail, stockholders can elect to receive ane-mail that provides a link to our future annual reports and proxy materials on the internet. If you opt to receive your proxy materials electronically, you will receive an automatic link to the proxy voting site. In addition, electing to receive your proxy materials electronically will save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to your home or business and reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings of stockholders.

May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors?

Yes. The following requirements apply to stockholder proposals, including director nominations, for our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders:

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to Be Considered for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials

Stockholders interested in submitting a proposal (other than the nomination of directors) for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed by us for our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders may do so by following the procedures prescribed inRule 14a-814a‑8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). To be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials, stockholder proposals must be received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on December 13, 2019,10, 2020, which is the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date that we released this Proxy Statement to our stockholders for the Annual Meeting. To be included in our proxy materials, your proposal also must comply with our Bylaws andRule 14a-814a‑8 promulgated under the Exchange Act regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. If we change the date of our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders by more than 30 days from the anniversary of this year’s Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must be received a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders. Such proposals should be sent to REGENXBIO Inc., 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Requirements for Stockholder Nomination of Director Candidates and Stockholder Proposals Not Intended for Inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Materials

Stockholders who wish to nominate persons for election to the Board at our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders or who wish to present a proposal at our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders, but who do not intend for such proposal to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for such meeting, must deliver written notice of the nomination or proposal to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 27, 2020,24, 2021, which is the 75th day prior to the first anniversary of the date we released this Proxy Statement to our stockholders for the Annual Meeting, and no later than February 26, 2020,23, 2021, which is the 45th day prior to the first anniversary of the date we released this Proxy Statement to our stockholders for the Annual Meeting. However, if we change the date of our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders by more than 30 days from the anniversary of this year’s Annual Meeting, such nominations and proposals must be received no later than the close of business on the later of (a) the 90th day prior to our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders and (b) the 10th day following the day we first publicly announce the date of our 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders. The stockholder’s written notice must include certain information concerning the stockholder and each nominee and proposal, as specified in our Bylaws. If the stockholder does not also satisfy the requirements ofRule 14a-4 promulgated under the Exchange Act, the persons named as proxies will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority when and if the matter is raised at the 20202021 annual meeting of stockholders. Such nominations or proposals should be sent to REGENXBIO Inc., 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Copy of Amended and Restated Bylaws

You may request a copy of our Bylaws to be delivered to you at no charge by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at REGENXBIO Inc., 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary. In addition, we have filed a copy of our Bylaws as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed on September 22, 2015, which may be accessed without charge on our website at www.regenxbio.com and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Under our Bylaws, the Board is divided into three classes of roughly equal size. The members of each class are elected to serve a three-year term with the term of office of each of the three classes ending in successive years. Pursuant to our Bylaws, the Board has fixed the current number of directors at nine. Donald J. Hayden, Jr., A.N. “Jerry” Karabelas, Ph.D., and Daniel J Abdun-Nabi, Allan M. Fox and Alexandra Glucksmann, Ph.D.,Tassé are the three Class III directors whose terms expire at this Annual Meeting. The Board has nominated Messrs. Abdun-NabiMr. Hayden, Dr. Karabelas and Fox and Dr. GlucksmannMr. Tassé (collectively, the “nominees” and each, a “nominee”) to serve until the 20222023 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Each of the nominees was recommended for election by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and each such recommendation was approved unanimously by the Board.

Shares represented by signed proxy cards will be voted on Proposal 1 “For” the election of Messrs. Abdun-NabiMr. Hayden, Dr. Karabelas and Fox and Dr. GlucksmannMr. Tassé to the Board at the Annual Meeting, unless otherwise marked on the card. If any of the nominees becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares represented by proxy will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee designated by the current Board, unless otherwise marked on the card. Messrs. Abdun-NabiMr. Hayden, Dr. Karabelas and Fox and Dr. GlucksmannMr. Tassé have each agreed to serve as a director if elected. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve if elected.

Certain information about each of the nominees is furnished below, including their business experience, public company director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years and the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the nominees should continue to serve as directors.

office of the law firm of Kaye Scholer. While in the public sector, Mr. Fox served as Chief of Staff and Chief Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Jacob K. Javits of New York. He also served as Chief Counsel to the United States Senate Health and Scientific Research Subcommittee, chaired by Senator Edward M. Kennedy. Mr. Fox has served as a director at WindMIL Therapeutics, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company, since March 2017. Mr. Fox was a Fellow in Law, Science and Medicine at Yale Law School where he received an LL.M. degree. Mr. Fox also holds a J.D. and B.A. from Temple University. Mr. Fox has specific attributes that qualify him to continue to serve as a member of the Board, including his broad experience in providing strategic advice to and investing in biotechnology companies throughout their life cycles, his expertise in identifying business opportunities, his deep experience with REGENXBIO since the time of its founding and his current and prior service on boards of directors.

Alexandra Glucksmann, Ph.D., has been a Director since May 2018. Dr. Glucksmann has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer ofand a director at Cedilla Therapeutics, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company, since April 2018. From October 2017 to March 2018, Dr. Glucksmann was anEntrepreneur-in-Residence at Third Rock Ventures, LLC, a privately held healthcare venture firm, where she focused on company formation. She was also a founding employee of Editas Medicine, Inc., a publicly held biotechnology company, and served as its Chief Operating Officer from October 2013 to March 2017. Prior to that, Dr. Glucksmann was a founding employee of Cerulean Pharma Inc., a publicly held biotechnology company, and served as its Senior Vice President of research and business operations from September 2006 to June 2013. Dr. Glucksmann has served as a director at Scenic Biotech BV, a privately held biotechnology company, since September 2017. From August 2006 to May 2015, she served as a director at Taconic Biosciences, Inc. Dr. Glucksmann received a B.S. in Bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Ph.D. in Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology from the University of Chicago, and she completed her postdoctoral fellowship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Glucksmann’s qualifications to continue to serve as a member of the Board include her extensive experience in senior management positions at biotechnology companies, particularly her experience in the formation and development of biotechnology companies.

Vote Required

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. The three nominees receiving the highest number of “For” votes will be elected. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE.

Continuing Directors Not Standing for Election

Certain information about those directors whose terms do not expire at the Annual Meeting is furnished below, including their business experience, public company director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the directors should serve as one of our directors. The term of the Class II directors will expire at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, and the term of the Class III directors will expire at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.

Class II Directors (Terms Expire in 2020)

Donald J. Hayden, Jr. has been a Director and the Chairman of the Board since February 2013. From 1991 to 2006, Mr. Hayden held several executive positions with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a biopharmaceutical company, most recently serving as Executive Vice President and President, Americas. Mr. Hayden served as Chairman of the board of directors at Insmed Incorporated (“Insmed”), a publicly held biopharmaceutical company, from December 2010 to November 2018 and he currently serves as a director at Insmed. He also has served as Chairman of the board of directors at WindMIL Therapeutics, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company, since January 2017 and as a director at Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., a privately held U.S. subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., since January 2010. Mr. Hayden served as Lead Independent Director at Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (“Amicus”) from February 2010 to October 2018, director at Amicus from March 2006 to October 2018, Chairman of the board of directors at Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from March 2006 to October 2016, and as a director at Dimension Therapeutics, Inc., from October 2013 to July 2015. Mr. Hayden holds a B.A. from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from Indiana University. Mr. Hayden has specific attributes that qualify him to continue to serve as a member of the Board, including his broad experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry, his service chairing public and private company boards, his experience helping shape new technologies, products and markets and his experience leading health care businesses in the United States and internationally.

A.N. “Jerry” Karabelas, Ph.D., has been a Director since May 2015. Dr. Karabelas has been a Partner at Care Capital, LLC (“Care Capital”), a life sciences venture firm, since December 2001. Prior to joining Care Capital, Dr. Karabelas was Chairman at Novartis BioVentures Fund, which is owned by Novartis AG (“Novartis”), a provider of capital for life sciences companies across the biotech, medical devices and diagnostics industries, prior to which he was the Chief Executive Officer of Novartis Pharma AG, which is also owned by Novartis. Before joining Novartis, Dr. Karabelas was Executive Vice President, Worldwide Pharmaceuticals of SmithKline Beecham, where he was responsible for U.S. and European operations, regulatory and strategic marketing. Dr. Karabelas has served as a director at Bausch Health Companies Inc., a publicly held specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company, since June 2016, a director at Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a privately held pharmaceutical company, since September 2015 and Chairman of the board of directors at Polyphor AG, a privately held pharmaceutical company, since June 2013. He served as Chairman of the board of directors at Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corporation from July 2012 to June 2016. In connection with his work at Care Capital, Dr. Karabelas previously served on numerous boards of directors of pharmaceutical and therapeutics companies, including Renovo, plc, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and NitroMed, Inc. Dr. Karabelas also previously served as Chairman of the board of directors at SkyePharma, plc and Human Genome Sciences. Dr. Karabelas received a B.S. from the University of New Hampshire and a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy. Dr. Karabelas has specific attributes that qualify him to continue to serve as a member of the Board, including his extensive experience in senior management positions at biopharmaceutical companies, his strong knowledge of strategic and regulatory issues, his insight into international operations and his international perspective on the life sciences industry and healthcare related issues.

DanielTassé has been a Director since August 2016. Mr. Tassé has served as the Chief Executive Officer of DBV Technologies SA, a publicly held biopharmaceutical company, since November 2018. From March 2016 to March 2019, he was the Chairman of Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc. (“Alcresta”), a privately held biopharmaceutical company, and from March 2016 to November 2018, he was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Alcresta. Mr. Tassé has served as a director at Indivior PLC (where he is the Lead Independent Director), a London Stock Exchange publicly traded pharmaceutical company, since August 2014. Additionally, he has served as a director at Bellerophon Therapeutics, Inc. (“Bellerophon”), a publicly held biopharmaceutical company, since December 2013, HLS Therapeutics Inc. (“HLS”), a Toronto Stock Exchange publicly traded pharmaceutical company, since March 2018, and BioQ Pharma (“BioQ”), a privately held pharmaceutical company, since December 2014, but Mr. Tasse does not expect to stand forre-election at Bellerophon, HLS or BioQ in 2019. Prior to the acquisition of Ikaria Inc. (“Ikaria”) by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals in April 2015, Mr. Tassé was President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Ikaria and served as the Interim Chief

Executive Officer and President of Bellerophon from February 2014 to June 2014. Previously, Mr. Tassé was the General Manager of the Pharmaceuticals and Technologies Business Unit of Baxter International, Inc. and Vice President and Regional Director for Australasia at GlaxoSmithKline plc. Mr. Tassé was a member of the Health Section Governing Board of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, where he participated on the bioethics, regulatory environment and reimbursement committees. Additionally, Mr. Tassé was a member of the board of directors of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, where he participated on the FDA and biomedical research committee. Mr. Tassé received a B.Sc. in Biochemistry from the University of Montreal. Mr. Tassé has specific attributes that qualify him to continue to serve as a member of the Board, including his extensive track record of business building in the healthcare industry, his strong background within critical care, his global management experience and his detailed knowledge of the life sciences industry.

Class III Directors (Terms Expire in 2021)

Luke M. Beshar has been a Director since April 2015. Mr. Beshar is a former Chief Financial Officer of various public and private companies and has more than 30 years of general and financial management experience. Mr. Beshar served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from November 2007 to February 2015 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cambrex Corporation, a life sciences company, from December 2002 to November 2007. Mr. Beshar began his career with Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1980 and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. BesharHe has served as a director and chair of the audit committee at Trillium Therapeutics Inc., a publicly held immuno-oncology company, since March 2014 and is currently chair of its audit and compensation committees. Mr. Beshar has served as a director at ArtaraArTara Therapeutics, a privatelypublicly held company focused on rare diseases, since October 2018.2018 and is currently Chairman of its board of directors and chair of its nominating and corporate governance committee. Mr. Beshar holds a B.S. degree in Accounting and Finance from Michigan State University and is a graduate of The Executive Program at the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Virginia. Mr. Beshar’s qualifications to continue to serve as a member of the Board include his financial and managerial experience in the biotechnology and life sciences industries, including serving as Chief Financial Officer, his financial and accounting expertise and his prior service on public and private company boards.

Kenneth T. Mills has been our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director since March 2009. Mr. Mills was with FOXKISER, most recently as a Partner, from January 2007 to January 2015. Mr. Mills was previously the Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Business Development at Meso Scale Diagnostics, a life sciences company, from January 2004 to December 2006 and was part of the original management team that established the company’s operations and financing strategy. From March 1997 to December 2003, Mr. Mills was employed at IGEN, a biotechnology company, where he served as Director of Business Development up through the company’s acquisition by Roche. Mr. Mills received an S.B. in Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. Mills’ qualifications to continue to serve as a member of the Board include his extensive experience as an executive in the gene therapy and biotechnology industries, including as President and Chief Executive Officer of our Company, his prior service as a senior-level executive in both early stage and mature biotechnology companies and his demonstrated business judgment.

David C. Stump, M.D., has been a Director since October 2015. From November 1999 to December 2012, Dr. Stump was with Human Genome Sciences, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, as Executive Vice President, Research and Development from May 2007 to December 2012, Executive Vice President, Drug Development from December 2003 to May 2007 and Senior Vice President, Drug Development from November 1999 to December 2003. Prior to joining Human Genome Sciences, Dr. Stump held roles of increasing responsibility at Genentech, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1989 to 1999, including Vice President, Clinical Research and Genentech Fellow. Prior to joining Genentech, Dr. Stump was an Associate Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at the University of Vermont. Dr. Stump has served as a member of the boards of directors at Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since June 2006, MacroGenics, Inc. since September 2013 and Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since September 2015, each of which is a publicly held biopharmaceutical company. He also currently serves on the board of trustees of Earlham College. Dr. Stump previously served as a director at Dendreon Corporation, a biotechnology company, from June 2010 to June 2015. Dr. Stump holds an A.B. from

Earlham College and an M.D. from Indiana University and completed his residency and fellowship training in internal medicine, hematology, oncology and biochemistry at the University of Iowa. Dr. Stump has specific attributes that qualify him to continue to serve as a member of the Board, including his substantial medical and scientific background and expertise, his extensive experience in research and development and operations in the biotechnology industry and his prior service on public company boards.

CORPORATE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Board is responsible for oversight of the management of the Company. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board selects and monitors our management team, provides oversight of our financial reporting processes and determines and implements our corporate governance policies.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines, which, along with the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation and Bylaws, and the charters of the committees of the Board, provide the framework for the governance of the Company.our corporate governance. Our current corporate governance guidelines can be found, together with other corporate governance information, in the corporate governance section of our corporate website at www.regenxbio.com. The Board also evaluates the charters of its committees from time to time, as appropriate.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We maintain a code of business conduct and ethics that qualifies as a “code of ethics” under Item 406 of the SEC’sRegulation S-K and applies to each of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of business conduct and ethics addresses various topics, including: (1) compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations; (2) conflicts of interest; (3) public disclosure of information; (4) insider trading; (5) corporate opportunities; (6) competition and fair dealing; (7) gifts; (8) discrimination, harassment and retaliation; (9) health and safety; (10) record-keeping;record keeping; (11) confidentiality; (12) protection and proper use of company assets; (13) payments to government personnel;prevention of corruption; and (14) the reporting of illegal and unethical behavior.

The code of business conduct and ethics is available in the corporate governance section of our corporate website at www.regenxbio.com. Any amendment or waiver of the “code of ethics” provisions of the code of business conduct and ethics for an executive officer or director may be granted only by the Board or a committee thereof and must be timely disclosed as required by applicable law. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements regarding any such amendment or waiver applicable to any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, in a current report filed with the SEC onForm 8-K or on our corporate website at www.regenxbio.com.

Director Independence

As required under Nasdaq listing standards, a majority of the members of a listed company’s board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. Consistent with these regulations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of such director’s family members, and the Company, its senior management and its independent registered public accounting firm, the Board has determined that all of our directors are independent directors within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq listing standards, except for Kenneth T. Mills, our President and CEO, and Allan M. Fox.

Information Regarding the Board of Directors and its Committees

As required under Nasdaq listing standards, our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for each of the Board committees during 2018:2019:

Below is a description of each committee of the Board. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees meets applicable rules and regulations regarding “independence” and that each such member is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to the Company.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board oversees the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and other financial information provided to the Company’s stockholders, the retention and performance of the Company’s independent accountants, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls and disclosure controls, and the Company’s compliance with ethics policies and SEC and related regulatory requirements. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the functions of the Audit Committee include, among other things: (1) appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our registered public accounting firm; (2) overseeing the work of our registered public accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration of reports from such firm; (3) reviewing and discussing with management and the registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures; (4) monitoring our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures; (5) meeting independently with our registered public accounting firm and management; (6) furnishing the audit committee report required by SEC rules; (7) reviewing and approving or ratifying any related person transactions; and (8) overseeing our risk assessment and risk management policies.

Our Audit Committee charter can be found in the corporate governance section of our corporate website at www.regenxbio.com.

Three directors comprisedcurrently comprise the Audit Committee as of December 31, 2018:Committee: Mr. Beshar (the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee), Mr. Abdun-Nabi and Dr. Stump. The Audit Committee met seveneight times during 2018.2019.

All members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Abdun-Nabi and Beshar is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable Nasdaq listing standards.

The Board annually reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in applicable Nasdaq listing standards andRule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act).

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board reviews and approves the design of, assesses the effectiveness of, and administers executive compensation programs for officers and employees, including our equity incentive plans. Pursuant to the Compensation Committee charter, the functions of the Compensation Committee include, among other things: (1) evaluating the performance of our CEO and determining the CEO’s salary and

contingent compensation based on his or her performance and other relevant criteria; (2) identifying the corporate and individual objectives governing the CEO’s compensation; (3) approving the compensation of our other executive officers; (4) making recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation; (5) reviewing and approving the terms of material agreements between us and our executive officers; (6) overseeing and administering our equity incentive plans and employee benefit plans; (7) reviewing and approving policies and procedures relating to the perquisites and expense accounts of our executive officers; (8) preparing the annual Compensation Committee report required by SEC rules; and (9) conducting a review of executive officer succession planning, as necessary, reporting its findings and recommendations to the Board, and working with the Board in evaluating potential successors to executive officer positions. In accordance with Nasdaq listing standards and our amended and restated Compensation Committee charter, the Board has granted our Compensation Committee the authority and responsibility to retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other compensation advisers, the authority to fund such advisers, and the responsibility to consider the independence factors specified under applicable law and any additional factors the Compensation Committee deems relevant. Our Compensation Committee charter can be found in the corporate governance section of our website at www.regenxbio.com.

ThreeFour directors comprisedcurrently comprise the Compensation Committee as of December 31, 2018:Committee: Mr. Hayden (the ChairmanChair of the Compensation Committee), Mr. Beshar, Dr. Glucksmann and Mr. Tassé. The Compensation Committee met seven times during 2018.2019.

The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in the Nasdaq listing standards). In addition, each of our directors serving on our Compensation Committee satisfies the heightened independence standards for members of a compensation committee under Nasdaq listing standards, and is anon-employee director, as defined pursuant toRule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and is an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).Act.

Our President and CEO often participates in the Compensation Committee’s meetings. He does not participate in the determination of his own compensation or the compensation of directors. However, our President and CEO does make recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of the other executive officers and key employees, and he often participates in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations about the compensation of such individuals. Our Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesChief People Officer and our Senior Vice President, General CounselChief Legal Officer also regularly participate in the Compensation Committee’s meetings, but they do not participate in the determination of the amount or form of the compensation of executive officers or directors.

The Compensation Committee retained Radford aas its independent compensation consulting firm,consultant from May 2015 to March 2019 and retained Willis Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant in April 2019. In connection with the 20182019 compensation paid by the Company, RadfordWillis Towers Watson provided the Compensation

Committee with data about the compensation paid by our peer group of companies and other employers who compete with the Company for executives, updated the Compensation Committee on new developments in areas that fall within the Compensation Committee’s jurisdiction and was available to advise the Compensation Committee regarding its responsibilities. Since April 2019, the Compensation Committee has retained Willis Towers Watson, a compensation consulting firm. The compensation consultant serves at the pleasure of the Compensation Committee rather than the Company, and the consultant’s fees are approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of each of Radford and Willis Towers Watson pursuant to applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that their work did not raise any conflict of interest.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees to the Board and committees of the Board, conducts searches for appropriate directors, and evaluates the performance of the Board and of individual directors. Pursuant to the Nominating and Corporate Governance

Committee charter, the functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things: (1) identifying, evaluating, and making recommendations to the Board and our stockholders concerning nominees for election to the Board, to each of the Board’s committees and as committee chairs; (2) annually reviewing the performance and effectiveness of the Board and developing and overseeing a performance evaluation process; (3) annually evaluating the performance of management, the Board and each Board committee against their duties and responsibilities relating to corporate governance; (4) annually evaluating adequacy of our corporate governance structure, policies, and procedures; and (5) providing reports to the Board regarding the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s nominations for election to the Board and its committees.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter can be found in the corporate governance section of our website at www.regenxbio.com.

Two directors comprisedcurrently comprise the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as of December 31, 2018:Committee: Dr. Karabelas (the ChairmanChair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) and Dr. Stump. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during 2018.2019.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including being able to read and understand basic financial statements and having a general understanding of the Company’s industry. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers other factors it deems appropriate, including, but not limited to:

In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers diversity, age, skills, and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the then-current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to the Company during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any other relationships and transactions that might impair such directors’ independence.

We believe that each of our directors brings a strong background and set of skills to our Board, giving the Board, as a whole, an appropriate balance of diversity, knowledge, experience, attributes, skills and expertise. In addition, seven of our nine directors are independent under Nasdaq standards (Mr. Mills, our President and CEO, and Mr. Fox being the exceptions) and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that all nine directors are independent of the influence of any particular stockholder or group of stockholders whose interests may diverge from the interests of our stockholders as a whole. We believe that our directors have a broad range of personal characteristics including leadership, management, pharmaceutical, gene therapy business, marketing and financial experience and abilities to act with integrity, with sound judgment and collegially, to consider strategic proposals, to assist with the development of our strategic plan and oversee its

implementation, to oversee our risk management efforts and executive compensation and to provide leadership, to commit the requisite time for preparation and attendance at Board and committee meetings and to provide required expertise on Board committees.

In evaluating director candidates, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has reviewed the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our directors and nominees, including those identified in the biographical information set forth above in the section entitled “Election of Directors.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the members of the Board offer insightful and creative views and solutions with respect to issues facing the Company. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes that the members of the Board function well together as a group. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the above-mentioned attributes and qualifications, along with the leadership skills and other experiences of the members of the Board described in further detail above under the section entitled “Election of Directors,” provide the Company with the perspectives and judgment necessary to guide the Company’s strategies and monitor their execution.

When there is a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems it appropriate, a professional search firm. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider such candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board by majority vote.

Diversity

The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. However, the Board believes that it is important that its members represent diverse viewpoints, with a broad array of experiences, professions, skills and backgrounds that, when considered as a group, provide a sufficient mix of perspectives to allow the Board to best fulfill its responsibilities to the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders.

Board Renewal

The Board believes it is important to have experienced directors with a deep understanding of the Company’s business as well as othernewer directors who bring fresh perspectives to the Board. In its efforts to identify potential director candidates, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider the input from the directors’ self-evaluation process to identify the backgrounds and expertise that are desired and the future needs of the Board in light of anticipated director retirements or resignations. The Board’s ongoing

assessment of its collective skills, experience and expertise resulted in the recruitment of three new independent directors within the past threefour years.

In recruiting Alexandra Glucksmann, Ph.D., a new independent director in 2018, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retained the search firm of Odgers Berndtson to help identify director prospects, perform candidate outreach, assist in reference and background checks and provide other related services. Our recruiting process typically involves either a search firm or a member of the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee contacting a prospect to gauge the prospect’s interest and availability. A candidate will then meet with several members of the Board and then meet with members of the Company’s management as appropriate. At the same time, the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the search firm will contact references for the prospect. A background check is completed before a final recommendation is made to the Board to appoint a candidate to the Board.

Meetings of the Board

The Board met fiveeight times during 2018.2019. Each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he or she served, held during the period for which he or she was a director or committee member.

Directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Seven of our eightAll nine then-continuing directors attended our 20182019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee is or has ever been an officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or our Compensation Committee.

Performance Evaluations of the Board of Directors and its Committees

In accordance with our corporate governance guidelines and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, the Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, evaluates the performance of the Board, its committees and each individual director on an annual basis. Each member of the Board conducts an annual self-evaluation for the purpose of determining whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. As part of this process, each director considers the effectiveness of the Board and each committee on which the director serves. The results of the evaluations are discussed at subsequent meetings of the Board and its committees.

Director NominationNominations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders and evaluate them using the same criteria as candidates identified by the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also take into consideration the number of shares of the Company’s common stock held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that those shares have been held. To recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a stockholder must submit the recommendation in writing to the Company, including the following information:

Recommendations and the information described above should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at REGENXBIO Inc., 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Once a person has been identified by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as a potential director candidate, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may: collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further; request additional information from the candidate and the proposing stockholder; contact references or other persons to assess the candidate; and conduct one or more interviews with the candidate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider that informationcandidate in light of information regarding any other candidates that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may be evaluating at that time, as well as any relevant director search criteria. The evaluation process generally does not vary based on whether or not a candidate is recommended by a stockholder; however, as stated above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholder and the length of time that those shares have been held.

In addition to recommending director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, stockholders may also nominate candidates for election to the Board at an annual meeting of stockholders. For more information, see “Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials and Voting—May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors?”

Separation of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Roles

The Board separates the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO. Separating these positions allows our CEO to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. The Board recognizes the time, effort, and energy that the CEO is required to devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our Chairman of the Board, particularly as the Board’s oversight responsibilities continue to grow. We believe that having separate positions and having an outside director serve as Chairman of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time.

Risk Oversight

The Board has responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s risk management processes and, either as a whole or through its committees, regularly discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on our business and the steps we take to manage them. The risk oversight process includes the Board receiving regular reports from Board committees and members of senior management to enable the Board to understand and evaluate the Company’s risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies with respect to areas of potential material risk, including operations, finance, legal, regulatory, strategic, reputational, cybersecurity and cybersecurityhuman capital risk. The oversight of risk within the Company is an evolving process requiring the Company to continually look for opportunities to further embed systematic enterprise risk management into ongoing business processes within the Company.

The Audit Committee reviews information regarding liquidity and operations, and oversees our management of financial risks. Periodically, the Audit Committee reviews our policies with respect to risk assessment, risk management, loss prevention and regulatory compliance. Oversight by the Audit Committee includes direct communication with our external auditor, and discussions with management regarding significant risk exposures and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such exposures. The Compensation Committee is responsible for assessing whether any of our compensation policies or programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee manages risks associated with the independence of the Board, corporate governance practices, and potential conflicts of interest. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks. Matters of significant strategic risk are considered by the Board as a whole.

Communications with the Board

The Board is interested in receiving communications from stockholders and other interested parties. These parties may contact any member of the Board or any committee of the Board, thenon-employee directors as a group or the chairperson of any committee. In addition, the Audit Committee is interested in receiving communications from employees and other interested parties regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters. Any such correspondence should be addressed to the appropriate person or persons, either by name or title, and sent to our Corporate Secretary at REGENXBIO Inc., 9600 Blackwell Road, Suite 210, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will review all such communications, but may, in his or her sole discretion, disregard any communication that he or she believes is not related to the duties and responsibilities of the Board. If deemed an appropriate communication, the Corporate Secretary will share the communication with the applicable director or directors.

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our Board determines the compensation of ournon-employee directors in conjunction with recommendations made by the Compensation Committee. We use a combination of cash and share-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. Kenneth T. Mills, our President and CEO and a member of the Board, did not receive any compensation from us during our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019 for his service as a director and is not included in the 20182019 Director Compensation Table below.

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

In 2018,October 2019, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, amended our compensation program for non-employee directors, effective as of January 1, 2020. Based on peer group data and analysis provided by Willis Towers Watson, the annual cash compensation level was increased for the Chair of the Compensation Committee from $12,500 to $15,000. We have filed a copy of the program, as amended, as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report.

In 2019, pursuant to theour then-effective compensation program fornon-employee directors, each member of the Board who was not our employee received the following annual cash compensation for Board services, as applicable, paid in quarterly installments in arrears:

In addition to the cash compensation described above, each member of the Board who served on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received additional cash compensation as follows, paid in quarterly installments in arrears:

Option Awards

Non-employee members of the Board receive automatic grants ofnon-statutory stock options under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. Eachnon-employee director upon joining the Board is automatically granted anon-statutory stock option to purchase 25,00020,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Each of these options vests in equal monthly installments over the 36 months following the date of the grant, and each provides for full acceleration in the event of a change in control.

In addition, on the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders, eachnon-employee director is automatically granted anon-statutory stock option to purchase 12,50010,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Anon-employee director who receives an initial award will not receive the additional annual award for that year. The annual grants vest in equal monthly installments over the 12 months following the date of the grant, and each provides for full acceleration in the event of a change in control.

In May 2019, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, amended our compensation program for non-employee directors to adjust the numbers of shares of common stock underlying stock options to be granted to non-employee directors. Based on peer group data and analysis, as well as an analysis of the then-current value of our stock options, each provided by Willis Towers Watson, the number of shares of common stock underlying the initial stock option grant was decreased from 25,000 to 20,000 and the number of shares of common stock underlying the annual stock option grant was decreased from 12,500 to 10,000.

Other Compensation

We reimburse ournon-employee directors for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings. We also provide customary director and officer insurance for all directors.

20182019 Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to ournon-employee directors in 2018:2019:

__________

As of December 31, 2018,2019, ournon-employee directors held the following outstanding options to purchase shares of our common stock:

__________

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 2:

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2019,2020, and has further directed that management submit this selection for ratification by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting.  PwC has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2015. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of PwC is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. As provided in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee annually reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence, including reviewing all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and us and any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the performance, objectivity or independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.

In determining whether to reappoint PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee took into consideration a number of factors, including the length of time the firm has been engaged, the quality of the Audit Committee’s ongoing discussions with PwC, an assessment of the professional qualifications and past performance of PwC and the potential impact of changing independent registered public accounting firms. Through its experience with the Company, PwC has gained institutional knowledge and expertise regarding the Company’s operations, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee believes that appointing a new independent registered accounting firm would require a significant time commitment that could interfere with management’s focus on financial reporting and internal controls.

Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or laws require stockholder ratification of the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of PwC to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Vote Required

In order for Proposal 2 to pass, the number of votes cast “For” Proposal 2 must exceed the number of votes cast against Proposal 2. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted either “For” or “Against” the proposal and will have no effect on the proposal. We do not expect to receive brokernon-votes on this proposal because the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is a matter on which banks, brokers or other nominees are generally empowered to vote any shares for which a beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees

The following table represents aggregate fees billed to the Company for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, by PwC, our independent registered public accounting firm:

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of aggregate fees billed or incurred by PwC for professional services rendered in connection with the annual audit of our financial statements, including internal control attestation for the year ended December 31, 2018,attestations, quarterly review procedures, consents issued for our registration statements and securities offerings.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed or incurred by PwC for due diligence services related to mergers and acquisitions rendered during the year ended December 31, 2017.

All Other Fees

All other fees consist of license fees billed or incurred by PwC for access to its proprietary disclosure checklist software platform.

All audit fees audit-related fees and other fees described above werepre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with applicable SEC requirements.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee’s policy is topre-approve all audit and permissiblenon-audit services rendered by PwC, our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee canpre-approve specified services in defined categories of audit services, audit-related services, tax services and all other services up to specified amounts, as part of the Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of PwC or on an individualcase-by-case basis before PwC is engaged to provide a service.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBERThe Board unanimously recommends a vote “For” the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019.

PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL 3:

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are holding a stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, or a“say-on-pay “say-on-pay vote,” as described in the “Executive Compensation” section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in this Proxy Statement. At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to approve the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of REGENXBIO Inc. (the “Company”) hereby approve, on anon-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables thereto, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Compensation Committee oversees and administers our executive compensation program, including the evaluation and approval of compensation plans, policies and programs offered to our named executive officers. Our executive compensation program is designed to meet the following objectives:

Please see the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement for a detailed discussion about our executive compensation program, including information about the 20182019 compensation of our named executive officers.

While this vote is being conducted on an advisory basis, and is therefore not binding on us, the vote will be carefully considered by the Compensation Committee and the Board. Both the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any meaningful vote against the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and evaluate what actions, if any, may be appropriate to address those concerns. The outcome of the vote, however, will not be construed as overruling any prior decision by the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. The current frequency of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote.

Vote Required

In order for Proposal 3 to pass, the number of votes cast “For” Proposal 3 must exceed the number of votes cast “Against” Proposal 3. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted either “For” or “Against” the proposal and will have no effect on the proposal.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE 2018 COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

PROPOSAL 4:

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In addition to the stockholder advisoryThe Board unanimously recommends a vote on executive compensation, we are also holding a stockholder advisory vote as to the frequency with which stockholders would have an opportunity to provide an advisory determination on executive compensation. Under SEC rules, this vote on frequency is required once every six years.

For the reasons described below, we recommend that our stockholders approve the following resolution, which is to implement a frequency of every three years, or a triennial vote, on executive compensation.

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of REGENXBIO Inc. (the “Company”) hereby approve, on anon-binding advisory basis, a triennial vote by the stockholders of the Company, on anon-binding advisory basis, on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our Board believes that a triennial vote on executive compensation is the best approach for the Company based on a number of considerations, including the following:

While this vote is being conducted“For” thE approval, on an advisory basis, and is therefore not binding on us,of the vote will be carefully considered by the Compensation Committee and the Board. Both the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions2019 compensation of our stockholders and, we will consider the outcome of the vote when determining the frequency of future advisory votes to approve executive compensation. The outcome of the vote, however, will not be construed as overruling any prior decision by the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board.Named Executive Officers.

Vote Required

In voting on Proposal 4, you can choose whether the advisory vote on executive compensation should be conducted every one year, every two years or every three years. You may also abstain from voting on this item. The approval requirement for this proposal is a plurality of the votes cast. The frequency option receiving the most votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency that is recommended by stockholders. Abstentions and brokernon-votesINFORMATI will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BE HELD EVERY 3 YEARS.

ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names of the current executive officers of the Company and certain information about each of them are set forth below:

Kenneth T. Mills. For information regarding Mr. Mills, our President and CEO and a member of our Board, see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors.”

Vittal “Vit”Vit Vasista, age 51,52, has been our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since August 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Vasista served as Principal at PRTM Management Consultants from October 2006 to July 2009, where he developed operational strategies for both private and public organizations, including the development of market entry strategies, innovative business models, and operational improvements. Mr. Vasista received an M.B.A. from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University, and an S.B. in Mechanical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Curran Simpson, age 58, is currently our Senior Vice President, Chief Operations and Technology Officer and has been on our senior management team since August 2015. Prior to joining us, Mr. Simpson was the Regional Supply Chain Head for North America at GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK”), a pharmaceutical company, from December 2012 until August 2015. Mr. Simpson was the Senior Vice President, Operations at the Human Genome Sciences division of GSK (“HGS”) from July 2006 to December 2012, as well as the Vice President, Manufacturing Operations at HGS from January 2003 to June 2006. Prior to HGS, Mr. Simpson held various positions with Biogen, Inc., Covance Biotechnology Services Inc., Novo-Nordisk Biochem Inc., Genentech, Inc. and Genencor, Inc. Mr. Simpson received an M.S. in Surface and Colloid Science (Physical Chemistry) from Clarkson University and a B.S. in Chemistry/Chemical Engineering from Clarkson College of Technology.

Steve Pakola, M.D., age 51, has been our Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Officer since April 2019. Prior to joining us, Dr. Pakola served as Chief Medical Officer of Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from October 2015 until April 2019. From April 2012 until October 2015, Dr. Pakola was the Chief Medical Officer of Amakem NV, a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to Amakem, from May 2000 until April 2012, Dr. Pakola was the Chief Medical Officer of ThromboGenics NV, a biopharmaceutical company, where he was the lead inventor and program lead for the Jetrea (ocriplasmin) program. Dr. Pakola received an M.D. and a B.A. in Biology, each from the University of Pennsylvania.

Olivier Danos, Ph.D., age 61,62, has been our Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer since March 2017. Prior to joining us, Dr. Danos was the Senior Vice President, Cell and Gene Therapy at Biogen Inc., a biotechnology company, from September 2014 until March 2017, where he led its gene therapy research and development activities. From September 2011 to September 2014, Dr. Danos was the Senior Vice President, Molecular Medicine, Synthetic Biology and Gene Regulation at Kadmon Pharmaceuticals. Prior to Kadmon, Dr. Danos served as the Director of the Gene Therapy Consortium of the University College of London and led a gene therapy research team at the Necker Hospital—Enfants Malades in Paris. He also served as the Chief Scientific Officer at Genethon and Senior Director of Research at Somatix Therapy Corporation, and held senior roles at the French National Centre for Scientific Research and the Pasteur Institute in Paris. Dr. Danos is the former President and founding member of the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Dr. Danos received a Ph.D. in Biology from the Pasteur Institute and University of Paris Diderot and a Master in Science in Genetics and Molecular Biology at the University of Paris Orsay.

Curran SimpsonPatrick J. Christmas, age 57,49, is currently our Senior Vice President, Product Development and Chief TechnologyLegal Officer and served as our Senior Vice President, Technical Operations from August 2015 to August 2018. Prior to joining us, Mr. Simpson was the Regional Supply Chain Head for North America at GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK”), a pharmaceutical company, from December 2012 until August 2015. Mr. Simpson was the Senior Vice President, Operations at the Human Genome Sciences division of GSK (“HGS”) from July 2006 to December 2012, as well as the Vice President, Manufacturing Operations at HGS from January 2003 to June 2006. Prior to HGS, Mr. Simpson held various positions with Biogen, Inc., Covance Biotechnology Services Inc., Novo-Nordisk Biochem Inc., Genentech, Inc. and Genencor, Inc. Mr. Simpson received an M.S. in Surface and Colloid Science (Physical Chemistry) from Clarkson University and a B.S. in Chemistry/Chemical Engineering from Clarkson College of Technology.

Patrick J. Christmas, age 48, has been on our Senior Vice President, General Counselsenior management team since August 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Christmas served as Interim General Counsel at Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from April 2015 until August 2016. From May 2011 until November 2014, Mr. Christmas was the Vice President, General Counsel of Lumara Health, a specialty pharmaceutical company. Prior to Lumara Health, Mr. Christmas was General Counsel at the Wellstat Companies, a group of biotechnology companies, from July 2007 until May 2011 and General Counsel at BioVeris Corporation, a publicly held diagnostics company, from April 2005 to July 2007. Mr. Christmas began his career as an Associate at the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. Mr. Christmas received a J.D. from the University of Notre Dame and a B.A. in Economics from Boston College.

EXECUTIVE

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) explains our compensation philosophy, policies and decisions for 20182019 for the following executives, whom we refer to in this CD&A and in the related tables as our named executive officers (“NEOs”):

Process of Determining Executive Compensation

Role of the Compensation Committee and the Board. Our Compensation Committee has been delegated the authority to make determinations regarding all elements of compensation for our executives. The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to advise themit on the competitiveness of the executive compensation program, including an annual peer group review and annual analysis of all elements of executive compensation for each executive. Compensation packages for each executive are typically finalized and approved at the first Compensation Committee meeting each year. The independent members of the Board ratify recommendations made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation and performance objectives of our President and CEO.

Role of Management. Our Compensation Committee, inIn making executive compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee may solicit input from management as appropriate with respect to individual and Company performance and results. The Compensation Committee receives recommendations and evaluations with respect to the compensation and performance of our executives from our President and CEO (except for his own compensation and performance). The Senior Vice President, Human ResourcesChief People Officer works with the compensation consultant to provide any internal data it requires. The Compensation Committee considered assessments from management when making 20182019 compensation decisions.

Role of the Compensation Consultant. Our Compensation Committee is authorized to select and retain its own independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee has retained Willis Towers Watson in this role since April 2019 and previously retained Radford in this role from May 2015 to March 2019. During that time, RadfordThe compensation consultants have annually conducted a comprehensive assessment of our executive compensation program and pay levels. Radfordlevels, advised the Compensation Committee on evolving best practices in executive compensation and provided benchmarking data and recommendations. Since April 2019, the Compensation Committee has retained Willis Towers Watson in this role. The Compensation Committee conducted an evaluation of each of Radford and Willis Towers Watson and concluded that neither engagement raised any conflict of interest.

Peer Group Data. Our Compensation Committee reviews our peer group annually to ensure it remains relevant and current. Our Compensation Committee, upon advice received from its independent compensation consultant, selected the 2021 companies that comprised our peer group for determining 20182019 compensation through a screening process that considered publicly traded biopharmaceutical companies similar to us in headcount and market capitalization.

Our 20182019 peer group companies were as follows:

Survey Data. In addition to using peer group data, the Compensation Committee usedreferenced survey data from a custom peer group of biopharmaceutical companies from the Radford Global Life Sciences Survey as of July 1, 20172018 to inform compensation decisions for 2018. The custom data cut included 107 public2019.

pre-commercial biotechnology companies with a median headcount of 67 and a median market capitalization of approximately $667 million.

Elements of Compensation

The compensation paid to our NEOs in 20182019 included the following elements:

The elements of our 20182019 executive compensation program and compensation decisions for NEOs are described in further detail below.

Base Salary

Our Compensation Committee reviews and sets base salaries for NEOs, other than the President and CEO, on an annual basis in January of each year. Our Board determines the base salary for our President and CEO based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.

Our Compensation Committee and Board seek to establish and maintain base salaries for each position and level of responsibility that are competitive with those of executives at our peer group companies. In determining the base salary for each executive, the Compensation Committee takes many factors into account, including but not limited to:

Our NEOs were given merit increases to their base salaries in 20182019 as a result of their respective performances in 2017. These merit increases were generally aligned with those provided to all other employees. The2018, except Dr. Pakola, who joined us in April 2019. In consideration of the factors described above, the base salaries for our NEOs were adjusted as follows in 2018:2019:

Furthermore, adjustments for annual base salaries approved in 2020 have been determined by the Compensation Committee. The highest percentage increase in annual base salary from 2019 to 2020 for any NEO was 5.0%, and the percentage increase for each of Messrs. Mills and Vasista was 3.0%.

Annual Short-Term Cash Incentive

We have an annual cash incentive program for all employees, which is intended to align corporate, departmental, and individual goals throughout the Company and to provide an incentive that further ties compensation to achievement of those goals. In establishing targets for the cash incentive awards for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee (and the Board, in the case of our President and CEO) considers cash incentive awards paid to executives in similar positions at our peer group companies.

For 2018,2019, target cash incentive award percentages were adjusted from the prior year, except for Dr. Pakola, who joined us in April 2019, as follows:

For 2018,2019, our Compensation Committee determined that the cash incentive awards for our NEOs, except for our President and CEO, Mr. Mills, would be determined based on corporate and individual objectives. Given Mr. Mills’ more substantial influence on the overall performance of the Company, the Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate and in the best interests of our stockholders to have Mr. Mills’ cash incentive award be based solely upon the achievement of corporate objectives, and the independent Board members concurred. The Compensation Committee believes that including the achievement of individual goals as a component of our cash incentive award payouts is important to motivate our NEOs other than Mr. Mills, as we continue to progress toward the commercial phase of our Company. For 2018,2019, weightings allocated to corporate and individual objectives were as follows:

The Company’s annual cash incentive program, which is approved by the Compensation Committee and applicable to all employees, utilizes both a corporate performance multiplier and an individual performance multiplier. The corporate performance multiplier is based on the degree to which the Company’s objectives have been achieved during the relevant year; this multiplier is determined by the Compensation Committee and may range from 0 to 200% of target, provided that, if it is determined to be less than 50% of target, there will be no

payout for the portion of our annual incentive program that is attributable to corporate performance. The individual

performance modifier is based on the degree to which each employee’s individual objectives have been achieved during the relevant year; this multiplier is approved by the Compensation Committee for each of our NEOs and may range from 0 to 200% of target.

Corporate Objectives

Near the beginning of each year, our management recommends annual corporate objectives to our Compensation Committee and Board for approval. These objectives serve as the basis for determining our performance against key strategic and operating parameters for the year.

The Compensation Committee (andand the Board with respect to our President and CEO) approved the corporate objectives and weightings for 20182019 as reflected in the table below. At the time of approval, the Compensation Committee believed that these objectives were challenging but attainable, and that attainment was uncertain.